Home | Contact Us | 24-Hour Support Line: 1800 774 744


IMAGINE the anguish being suffered by the family of Daniel Christie. They made the heart-wrenching decision to turn off the 18-year-old’s life support system last Saturday – 11 days after he was coward-punched in Kings Cross on New Year’s Eve.

Imagine. Empathise. But don’t get blindsided by it.

Calls for legislation to impose harsher penalties for “one-punch offenders” are a knee-jerk reaction. They miss the point.

And that point is, Daniel’s death is just the very tip of the iceberg which represents the violence on our streets. If we are to reduce the number of deaths like Daniel’s, we need to tackle the wider problem.

That is the mammoth number of assaults that take place every single day across the country – particularly on Friday and Saturday nights.

By tackling assaults and not just deaths, we will be solving the terrible problem – horrific injuries caused by assaults.

Don’t get me wrong, Daniel’s death is a tragedy. And it shouldn’t be ignored. It will have affected a huge number of people. Not just his family and friends, but also those who didn’t know him well.


His family spoke about his death having “torn a hole in the wider community in which he was involved”. Think of the impact on all the people who knew Daniel.

If only Daniel’s case was an isolated incident. But we know it’s not.

Remember Thomas Kelly – king-hit in Kings Cross in 2012. Or Daniel Cassai – killed in Rye just over a year ago.

In the last six years there have been at least 15 deaths nationally caused by “one punch”.

The NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell has spoken about “one punch” legislation. Essentially, the law would result in increasing the chances of heavy penalties for those responsible for a “one punch” death.

While I don’t oppose this, we shouldn’t for a second think that legislation is the answer. It absolutely isn’t.

I doubt any of the 15 “one punch” deaths involved an offender who thought his one punch would kill. So providing heavy penalties in one-punch death cases is unlikely to deter anyone.

Instead, we need to cast the net wider and target assaults generally. We should aim to stop assaults, because every punch is a potential one-punch death.

And, of course, the number of assaults absolutely dwarf the number of deaths.

So as much as we should desperately try to reduce one-punch deaths, we should do so by trying to stop the injuries that come from assaults. Do this, and not only do we stop the deaths, we stop the cause of 20 per cent of brain injuries to people aged 15-25.

We should not forget the significant number of victims who suffer ongoing disability following an assault. This may include ongoing physical ailments, cognitive difficulties like memory and concentration problems, or behavioural changes limiting one’s ability to return to work/study or reintegrate socially into the community.

According to Victoria Police statistics, last year there were more than 46,000 assaults recorded in the state. That’s probably a conservative figure, given that many assaults aren’t reported to police.

Step Back Think is an organisation formed in the wake of the horrific injuries sustained by James Macready-Bryan in 2006. James – or MB as he was known to his friends – was assaulted in the Melbourne CBD on his 20th birthday. A single punch knocked MB to the ground, where his head smashed against the pavement. This resulted in catastrophic brain damage from which he will never recover. MB remains in a vegetative state, stuck permanently in a wheelchair, and has limited ability to communicate with his loved ones.

In the years since, countless more young men have sustained similar injuries from assaults – quite apart from those mentioned above who lost their lives.

Step Back Think’s mission is to educate people on the consequences of a single punch. The hope is that increased awareness will mean people will think twice about throwing a punch – leading to fewer instances of derailed lives or tragic deaths.

And in the same way, increasing the penalty for assaults may make people think twice before throwing a punch. But I’m not convinced that increasing penalties for punches causing death will have the same impact, because a person who punches another doesn’t expect the punch to kill.

Increasing penalties on punches causing deaths isn’t the answer. Increasing penalties on assaults generally will help.

But we need more education and awareness and attack the root cause of violence. But that’s another debate for another day.


Original source: www.adelaidenow.com.au


  • Date January 16, 2014
  • Tags Media Clippings - OPCK, One Punch Can Kill Program
Back to Portfolio

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Back to Top